Key result
High use of care coordination strategies linked to ~2 percentage point higher overall patient ratings.
Why the study?
Does greater use of hospital care coordination and transition strategies improve patient experience?
Cross-Sectional (n=992)
Yes
Does greater use of hospital care coordination and transition strategies improve patient experience?
Hospitals that implement more care coordination and transition strategies, especially patient-facing ones, report significantly better patient experience scores.
High use of strategies was associated with higher ratings; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Patient experience is a key measure of hospital quality and is increasingly contained in value-based payment programmes. Understanding whether strategies aimed at improving care transitions are associated with better patient experience could help clinical leaders and policymakers seeking to improve care across multiple dimensions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of specific hospital care coordination and transition strategies with patient experience. DESIGN: We surveyed leadership at 1600 acute care hospitals and categorised respondents into three groups based on the strategies used: low-strategy (bottom quartile of number of strategies), mid-strategy (quartiles 2 and 3) and high-strategy (highest quartile). We used linear regression models to examine the association between use of these strategies and performance on measures of patient experience from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. RESULTS: We achieved a 62% response rate. High-strategy hospitals reported using 7.7 strategies on average usually or always on their patient populations, while mid-strategy and low-strategy hospitals reported using 5.0 and 2.3 strategies, respectively. Compared with low-strategy hospitals, high-strategy hospitals had a higher overall rating (+2.23 percentage points (pp), P<0.001), higher recommendation score (+2.5 pp, P<0.001), and higher satisfaction with discharge process (+1.35 pp, P=0.01) and medication communication (+1.44 pp, P=0.002). Mid-strategy hospitals had higher scores than low-strategy hospitals except for discharge satisfaction. Patient-facing strategies, like sharing discharge summaries with patients prior to discharge, using discharge coordinators and calling patients 48 hours after discharge, were each individually associated with a higher overall hospital rating, and higher satisfaction with discharge process and medication communication. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals with greater reported use of care coordination and transition strategies have better patient experience than hospitals with fewer reported strategies. Strategies that most directly involve patients have the strongest association with better experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Figueroa et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Patient experience in acute care hospitals (n=992). High use of care coordination and transition strategies vs. Low use of strategies was evaluated on Overall hospital rating on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey (+2.23 percentage points, p=<0.001). Hospitals with high use of care coordination and transition strategies had a higher overall patient rating compared with low-strategy hospitals (+2.23 percentage points, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: