Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Measurements of the hand are common in studies that use anthropometric data. However, despite widespread usage, relatively few studies have formally assessed the degree of measurement error associated with standard measurements of the hand. This is significant because high amounts of measurement error can invalidate statistical results. In this paper, intraobserver precision estimates for measures of total hand length and total 3rd-digit length were evaluated from repeated measures on 90 subjects (180 separate hands and fingers). From this replicate data, three precision estimates were calculated: the technical error of measurement (TEM), the relative technical error of measurement (rTEM), and the coefficient of reliability (R). For both measurements, all three estimates yielded a very high degree of precision (TEM < 2 mm, rTEM < 1%, and R > or = 0.95). These results suggest that both total hand length and 3rd-digit length are sufficiently precise for anthropometric research applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weinberg et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: