Key result
D-CongNet and T-CongNet models achieve ~87% accuracy for CVD diagnosis with clinically meaningful explanations.
Why the study?
Existing machine learning approaches often use data augmentation like SMOTE to address class imbalance, which can introduce noise, distort feature distributions, and reduce interpretability.
Augmentation-free neural network models integrating Polynomial feature transformations and SHAP achieve high accuracy and interpretability for cardiovascular disease and breast cancer diagnosis.
May support interpretable ML diagnostics in CVD and breast cancer; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and breast cancer (BC) are among the leading causes of mortality worldwide, necessitating accurate and interpretable machine learning (ML) models for early diagnosis. Existing approaches often rely on data augmentation techniques such as SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique) to address class imbalance, but these methods can introduce noise, distort feature distributions, and reduce model interpretability. To overcome these challenges, we propose two augmentation-free neural network models, Double Conglomerate (D-CongNet) and Triple Conglomerate (T-CongNet), which integrate Polynomial feature transformations and SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) for feature analysis, ensuring both high predictive performance and robust interpretability. We evaluate our models on two publicly available datasets: the UCI Heart Disease dataset for CVD prediction and the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset for BC classification. D-CongNet and T-CongNet achieve state-of-the-art performance without augmentation, with 86.96% accuracy, 88.79% sensitivity, and 84.42% specificity for CVD, and 97.37% accuracy, 97.67% sensitivity, and 97.18% specificity for BC. Our models also provide clinically meaningful explanations, identifying MaxHR-ST_Slope as a critical predictor for CVD and concave points_mean-area_worst for BC, aligning with established medical knowledge. By eliminating the need for augmentation, D-CongNet and T-CongNet offer a transparent and reliable alternative to traditional oversampling methods, ensuring robust decision-making in medical applications. Our results demonstrate that augmentation-free ML models can achieve both high accuracy and interpretability, making them valuable tools for healthcare professionals seeking explainable AI-driven diagnostics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ejiyi et al. (2025) studied Cardiovascular disease and breast cancer. Double Conglomerate (D-CongNet) and Triple Conglomerate (T-CongNet) models with Polynomial-SHAP vs. Traditional oversampling methods (SMOTE) was evaluated on Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for CVD and BC prediction. Augmentation-free D-CongNet and T-CongNet models achieved 86.96% accuracy for cardiovascular disease and 97.37% accuracy for breast cancer diagnosis while providing clinically meaningful explanations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: