Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper offers a non-paternalistic justification for prospective research review as providing a credible social assurance that the institutions of scientific advancement respect and affirm the moral equality of all community members and as creating a "market" in which stakeholders working to advance diverse ends also advance the common good.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alex John London (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: