Key result
Sarcopenia fails to predict late death or major events after minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
While sarcopenia marks poor outcomes after median sternotomy cardiac surgery, its clinical impact after minimally invasive cardiac surgery has not been well established.
Does sarcopenia worsen early and late outcomes in elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery?
Cohort (n=367)
Does sarcopenia worsen early and late outcomes in elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery?
Sarcopenia does not appear to negatively impact perioperative outcomes or long-term survival in elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery, suggesting MICS is a reasonable approach for this high-risk population.
Sarcopenia may not worsen outcomes after minimally invasive cardiac surgery in the elderly; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Sarcopenia is an objective marker of poor outcome following cardiac surgery through median sternotomy. However, the clinical impact of sarcopenia after minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has not been well established. This study aimed to analyze the influence of sarcopenia on the early and late outcomes following MICS. We retrospectively examined 1248 patients who underwent MICS via right mini-thoracotomy or upper sternotomy between February 2009 and April 2020. Patients older than 65 years who underwent preoperative computed tomography were enrolled. Sarcopenia was defined as the lowest sex-specific quartile of the body surface area adjusted psoas muscle area. The early operative and late survival outcomes were compared, and the predictor of late composite outcome was analyzed using Cox proportional regression model. Early and late composite outcomes in both groups were also compared. A total of 367 patients were classified into the sarcopenia (n = 92) or non-sarcopenia (n = 275) group. Patients in the sarcopenia group were older, and had lower preoperative hemoglobin and albumin levels. They had higher estimated surgical mortality, but similar early mortality and major morbidity. The survival and late composite outcome were comparable between the two groups. Sarcopenia was neither an independent predictor of late death nor a composite outcome in the multivariable model. After MICS, patients with sarcopenia displayed comparable perioperative outcomes and survival. The clinical impact of sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes might be alleviated by MICS and early recovery protocol after MICS. MICS could be a reasonable approach for elderly patients with sarcopenia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (n=367). Sarcopenia vs. Non-sarcopenia was evaluated on Early operative and late survival outcomes, and late composite outcome. Sarcopenia was not an independent predictor of late death or composite outcomes after minimally invasive cardiac surgery, with both groups showing comparable perioperative outcomes and survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: