Key result
Konno aortic root enlargement is linked to ~100% fewer high-risk VTC cases versus the Y-incision technique.
Why the study?
To evaluate anatomic changes in the aortic root following different aortic root enlargement techniques and determine coronary obstruction risk during future valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Does the Konno procedure compared to the Y-incision procedure improve anatomic conditions and reduce the risk of coronary obstruction for future ViV-TAVR in patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement with aortic root enlargement?
Cohort (n=15)
Does the Konno procedure compared to the Y-incision procedure improve anatomic conditions and reduce the risk of coronary obstruction for future ViV-TAVR in patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement with aortic root enlargement?
The Konno procedure significantly increases LVOT size and access space to the coronary ostia compared to the Y-incision, potentially reducing the risk of coronary obstruction during future ViV-TAVR.
Objective: To evaluate anatomic changes in the aortic root after different aortic root enlargement (ARE) techniques and assess the risk of coronary obstruction during future valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of 15 patients who underwent bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement with ARE using either the Konno or Y-incision technique, preoperative and postoperative computed tomography CT scans were reviewed to measure annular diameter, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), sinus of Valsalva (SOV), sinotubular junction, and coronary ostia locations. The risk of coronary obstruction was evaluated using virtual transcatheter heart valve-to-coronary ostium distance (VTC) and transcatheter heart valve-to-aorta distance (VTA). Results: Both groups showed significant increases in annulus and SOV sizes; however, only the Konno group exhibited a significant increase in LVOT size. The distance from the valve center to the coronary ostia was significantly greater in the Konno group compared to the Y-incision group (+4.2 ± 3.5 mm for the left/right coronary artery in the Konno group vs +2.4 ± 0.6 mm in the Y-incision group). The Konno group demonstrated greater VTC and VTA, with all cases achieving VTC ≥4 mm and VTA ≥2 mm. In the Y-incision group, 33.0% had VTC <4 mm and 17.0% had VTA <2 mm. Conclusions: The Konno procedure significantly increased LVOT size and access space to the coronary ostia, reducing the risk of coronary obstruction during future ViV-TAVR. These findings suggest that the Konno procedure may provide more favorable conditions compared to the Y-incision in such cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement requiring aortic root enlargement (n=15). Konno aortic root enlargement vs. Y-incision aortic root enlargement was evaluated on Virtual transcatheter heart valve-to-coronary ostium distance (VTC) <4 mm. The Konno aortic root enlargement procedure provided greater access space to coronary ostia than the Y-incision technique, with 0% vs 33.0% of patients having a high-risk VTC <4 mm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: