PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 22, 2023Biological Psychiatry128 citationsOpen Access

Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation

CZChristoph ZrennerUZUlf Ziemann

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In the same way that beauty lies in the eye of the beholder, what a stimulus does to the brain is determined not simply by the nature of the stimulus but by the nature of the brain that is receiving the stimulus at that instant in time. Over the past decades, therapeutic brain stimulation has typically applied open-loop fixed protocols and has largely ignored this principle. Only recent neurotechnological advancements have enabled us to predict the nature of the brain (i.e., the electrophysiological brain state in the next instance in time) with sufficient temporal precision in the range of milliseconds using feedforward algorithms applied to electroencephalography time-series data. This allows stimulation exclusively whenever the targeted brain area is in a prespecified excitability or connectivity state. Preclinical studies have shown that repetitive stimulation during a particular brain state (e.g., high-excitability state), but not during other states, results in lasting modification (e.g., long-term potentiation) of the stimulated circuits. Here, we survey the evidence that this is also possible at the systems level of the human cortex using electroencephalography-informed transcranial magnetic stimulation. We critically discuss opportunities and difficulties in developing brain state-dependent stimulation for more effective long-term modification of pathological brain networks (e.g., in major depressive disorder) than is achievable with conventional fixed protocols. The same real-time electroencephalography-informed transcranial magnetic stimulation technology will allow closing of the loop by recording the effects of stimulation. This information may enable stimulation protocol adaptation that maximizes treatment response. This way, brain states control brain stimulation, thereby introducing a paradigm shift from open-loop to closed-loop stimulation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zrenner et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0673c2c284f20de188c502https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.09.014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus1993 · 11,612 citations
  2. 2Heightened synaptic plasticity of hippocampal CA1 neurons during a Cholinergically induced rhythmic state1993 · 571 citations
  3. 3High Gamma Power Is Phase-Locked to Theta Oscillations in Human Neocortex2006 · 2,789 citations
  4. 4The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability2022 · 114 citations
  5. 5Does pericentral mu-rhythm “power” corticomotor excitability? – A matter of EEG perspective2021 · 48 citations