Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between radiation (RT)-induced pulmonary symptoms and subclinical changes in pulmonary functions tests (PFT) and radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 184 patients irradiated between 1992 and 1998 were prospectively evaluated for RT-induced pulmonary symptoms, changes in computed tomography (CT) density, reductions in single photon emission CT (SPECT) perfusion, and changes in pulmonary functions tests (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] and diffusion capacity to carbon monoxide [DLCO]). Comparisons between the evaluable patients with (N=34) and without (N=106) RT-induced pulmonary symptoms were made. RESULTS: Within 6 months of RT, 80% of the RT-induced symptoms were noted. There was no association between the presence or absence of RT-induced pulmonary symptoms and the frequency of RT-induced radiographic changes (p=0.53), or in the dose-response curve for RT-induced reductions in regional perfusion. Overall, RT-induced changes in SPECT images were more commonly seen than increased density changes on CT (p<0.001). Most patients with pulmonary symptoms had relatively low pre-RT PFTs and experienced further declines following RT. CONCLUSIONS: Regional radiographic changes in CT-defined tissue density or SPECT-defined tissue perfusion are similar in patients with and without RT-induced pulmonary symptoms because these endpoints do not consider the volume of lung affected. RT-induced pulmonary symptoms are better related to post-RT PFT because they are an assessment of whole lung function. Additional studies are necessary to better define models that can predict the degree of radiation-induced changes in whole lung function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. Fan L. B. Marks (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: