SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of composite renal outcomes compared with GLP-1RAs (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.91; P=0.003) and nsMRAs (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.68-0.90; P=0.001) in T2D and CKD.
Meta-Analysis (n=50,938)
Do SGLT-2is, GLP-1RAs, and nsMRAs improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease?
In a network meta-analysis of patients with T2D and CKD, SGLT-2 inhibitors provided superior renal protection and reduction in heart failure hospitalizations compared to GLP-1RAs and nsMRAs.
Effect estimate: RR 0.77 (95% CI 0.64-0.91)
p-value: p=.003
AIM: To compare the relative efficacy of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (nsMRAs) in improving the cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception through 25 November 2022. We selected randomized controlled trials that studied patients with CKD and T2D with a follow-up of at least 24 weeks and compared SGLT-2is, GLP-1RAs and nsMRAs with each other and with placebo. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and composite renal outcomes (CRO). Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction and heart failure hospitalization (HFH). A frequentist approach was used to pool risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies with 50 938 participants for MACE and 49 965 participants for CRO were included. SGLT-2is did not significantly reduce MACE but were associated with significantly lower risks of CRO compared with GLP-1RAs (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.91; P = .003) and nsMRAs (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90; P = .001). Compared with GLP-1RAs and nsMRAs, SGLT-2is significantly reduced risks of HFH by 31% (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88; P = .002) and 22% (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95; P = .016), respectively, but did not significantly reduce other secondary outcomes. There were no significant differences between GLP-1RAs and nsMRAs in lowering all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT-2is were associated with better cardiorenal protection than GLP-1RAs and nsMRAs in patients with CKD and T2D.
Ngoc et al. (Wed,) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (n=50,938). SGLT-2 inhibitors vs. GLP-1RAs, nsMRAs, and placebo was evaluated on Composite renal outcomes (CRO) (SGLT-2is vs GLP-1RAs) (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.91, p=.003). SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of composite renal outcomes compared with GLP-1RAs (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.91; P=0.003) and nsMRAs (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.68-0.90; P=0.001) in T2D and CKD.