Key result
Non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation was more prevalent in stroke patients (19-29%) than in age-matched controls (3-9%), with evidence supporting both embolic and atherothrombotic stroke mechanisms.
Why the study?
Does non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation increase the risk of embolic stroke and mortality compared to sinus rhythm in patients admitted to a stroke unit?
Observational (n=402)
Does non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation increase the risk of embolic stroke and mortality compared to sinus rhythm in patients admitted to a stroke unit?
Non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation in stroke patients is associated with higher mortality, more severe brain lesions, and autopsy findings supporting an embolic origin, though atherothrombotic mechanisms also play a role.
AF detection merits attention in stroke units; leaves open the balance of embolic and atherothrombotic mechanisms.
The association between non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke has been studied in 402 patients consecutively admitted to a stroke unit. Brain infarction patients with sinus rhythm (n = 196) and non-rheumatic AF (n = 92) were further compared. Some findings supported an embolic origin of the stroke: half of the deceased AF patients (n = 24) at autopsy either had left atrial thrombosis or arterial embolism compared to none of the ten with sinus rhythm. Patients with AF also had a higher mortality and more severe brain lesions, findings compatible with a sudden occlusion of blood flow. However, these differences might also be explained by an atherothrombotic occlusion with impaired autoregulation in the ischaemic region in conjunction with heart failure, which was more common in the AF patients. Other findings supporting an atherothrombotic mechanism were: the prevalence of AF was higher (19-29%) in all kinds of stroke, including haemorrhage, than in age-matched controls (3-9%). Also patients with previous AF and no present embolic source resembled the whole AF group and differed from patients with sinus rhythm. Thus embolism is a plausible cause of stroke in many AF patients, whereas an atherothrombotic origin is more likely in others. Characteristics identifying the mechanism in an individual case were not found.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Britton et al. (1985) conducted an observational in Stroke (n=402). Non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation vs. Sinus rhythm was evaluated on Stroke mechanism (embolic vs atherothrombotic). Non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation was more prevalent in stroke patients (19-29%) than in age-matched controls (3-9%), with evidence supporting both embolic and atherothrombotic stroke mechanisms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: