PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026The Astronomical Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Exposure-averaged Gaussian Processes for Combining Overlapping Datasets

View Full Paper
JLJacob K. LuhnRRRyan A. RubenzahlSHSamuel Halverson

Key Points

  • This research aims to enhance Gaussian process models for analyzing stellar variability data, considering exposure times.
  • Developed physically motivated Gaussian process kernels for modeling stellar variability.
  • Extended framework to predict latent signals accounting for varying exposure times across instruments.
  • Applied the method to Sun-as-a-star EPRV datasets, ensuring compatibility with various overlapping instruments.
  • Demonstrated improved predictions of latent oscillation signals with integration of exposure times.
  • Showed significant enhancement in data interpretation for EPRV datasets from different observational sites.
  • Established a generalized approach applicable to other datasets with similar exposure time concerns.

Abstract

Abstract Physically motivated Gaussian process (GP) kernels for stellar variability, like the commonly used damped, driven simple harmonic oscillators that model stellar granulation and p -mode oscillations, quantify the instantaneous covariance between any two points. For kernels whose timescales are significantly longer than the typical exposure times, such GP kernels are sufficient. For time series where the exposure time is comparable to the kernel timescale, the observed signal represents an exposure-averaged version of the true underlying signal. This distinction is important in the context of recent data streams from extreme precision radial velocity (EPRV) spectrographs like fast-readout stellar data of asteroseismology targets and solar data to monitor the Sun’s variability during daytime observations. Current solar EPRV facilities have significantly different exposure times per site, owing to the different design choices made. Consequently, each instrument traces different binned versions of the same “latent” signal. Here, we present a GP framework that accounts for exposure times by computing integrated forms of the instantaneous kernels typically used. These functions allow one to predict the true latent oscillation signals and the exposure-binned version expected by each instrument. We extend the framework to work for instruments with a significant time overlap (i.e., similar longitude) by including relative instrumental drift components that can be predicted and separated from the stellar variability components. We use Sun-as-a-star EPRV datasets as our primary example, but present these approaches in a generalized way for application to any dataset where exposure times are a relevant factor or combining instruments with a significant overlap.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Luhn et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b74ce7dec685947aa377https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ae5d38
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Scalable Gaussian Processes for Integrated and Overlapping Measurements via Augmented State-space Models2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2A benchmark JWST near-infrared spectrum for the exoplanet WASP-39 b2024 · 62 citations
  3. 3Modelling stochastic and quasi-periodic behaviour in stellar time-series: Gaussian process regression versus power-spectrum fitting2024 · 16 citations
  4. 4Fishing for Planets: A Comparative Analysis of EPRV Survey Performance in the Presence of Correlated Noise2024 · 16 citations
  5. 5Detection of an Extrasolar Planet Atmosphere2002 · 1,379 citations