PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Journal of Dentistry0 citationsOpen Access

Three Years Long-Term Impact of Powered vs. Manual Toothbrushes on Hypersensitivity and Gingival Recession: A Randomized Controlled Trial

View Full Paper
SMSophie MeisterTHTobias HahnMCMiriam Cyris

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the long-term effects of powered versus manual toothbrushes on dentin hypersensitivity in patients with gingival recession.
  • Ninety participants with RT1 gingival recession were randomized into powered toothbrush (PT, n=47) and manual toothbrush (MT, n=43) groups.
  • Participants brushed twice daily for 36 months with fluoride toothpaste, and dentin hypersensitivity was evaluated annually using tactile stimulus and an air-jet.
  • Hypersensitivity scores were reassessed for 180 index teeth (94 PT, 86 MT).
  • At 36 months, powered toothbrush users showed a significant reduction in air-jet-induced hypersensitivity (HYP-L) compared to manual brush users (p=0.014).
  • 60% of powered toothbrush users experienced reduced hypersensitivity, whereas only 36% of manual toothbrush users showed a reduction.
  • Smokers demonstrated greater reduction in hypersensitivity compared to non-smokers (-1.17 vs. 0.10; p=0.006), and males had a more pronounced reduction in tactile sensitivity than females (-0.09 vs. -0.04; p=0.021).

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Gingival recessions (GR) are often associated with dentin hypersensitivity (HYP) and can significantly affect patients' oral health-related quality of life. This subgroup-analysis of a previously published study assesses the long-term effects of oscillating-rotating powered (PT) and manual toothbrushes (MT) on HYP in teeth with pre-existing GR and no interproximal attachment loss (RT1) over 36 months. METHODS: Ninety participants with RT1 were divided into PT-/MT-group (n=47/n=43). All participants brushed twice daily with the same fluoride toothpaste. HYP scores were reassessed for 180 index teeth (PT/MT: n=94/n=86); two teeth per participant. HYP was evaluated annually (T0(baseline), T1, T2 and T3) using tactile stimulus with a dental probe (HYP-S) and an air-jet (HYP-L) applied to the index teeth. RESULTS: At T3, HYP-L was significantly reduced in PT but not in MT (p=0.014). From T0 to T3, 60% of PT users showed a decrease in HYP-L, 6.4% remained stable, and 33% experienced an increase, whereas in MT, 36% showed a reduction, 18.6% remained stable, and 45.5% experienced an increase. This was consistent with the GR stabilization reported in the primary analysis. Between T0 to T3 smokers showed a significantly greater reduction in HYP-L than non-smokers (-1.17(1.49) vs. 0.10(2.27); p=0.006), regardless of toothbrush group. Male participants exhibited a more pronounced reduction in HYP-S compared to females (-0.09(1.85) vs. -0.04(1.11); p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: The tested powered toothbrush reduced HYP-L more than manual toothbrushing over 36 months; HYP-S was unaffected. Findings are exploratory and require confirmation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Over 36 months, oscillating-rotating powered brushing was associated with a reduction in air-jet-induced dentin hypersensitivity at RT1-type gingival recession sites. The effect is small and exploratory; powered brushing appears safe in this population but should not be recommended on the basis of hypersensitivity reduction until confirmed in a trial prospectively powered for that endpoint. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00015133) on July 25, 2018.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meister et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b74ce7dec685947aa386https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2026.106744
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper