Feasibility study demonstrates non-physician health workers effectively record lung sounds in children, indicating potential for broader applications.
Lung auscultation is not included in the WHO Integrated Management of Childhood Illness algorithm, partly due to concerns regarding feasibility and reliability when performed by non-physician primary health workers in low-resource settings. In this feasibility study, we evaluated whether non-physician primary care health workers (community health care providers (CHCPs)) can record quality lung sounds from children aged 2-59 months. Feasibility was predefined as more than 50% of children having quality recordings at the overall sample level. After receiving three days of structured training, nine CHCPs recorded lung sounds from four chest positions using a digital stethoscope (Sonavi Labs, United States) in 990 children attending first-level rural clinics in Bangladesh between November 2019 and December 2020, with enrolment paused during the COVID-19 pandemic. A blinded paediatrician listening panel, trained to a standardised interpretation protocol, classified the recordings. A quality recording was defined a priori as the panel classifying three of four chest positions on a participant as interpretable. Lung sounds were recorded from 990 children, and the panel classified 867 children as having a quality recording (87.6%; 95% confidence interval: 85.4%, 89.6%). Among children with quality recordings and available timing data, 89.8% (766/853) were recorded within five minutes. This study demonstrates CHCPs at rural, first-level clinics in Bangladesh are capable of timely, quality recordings of lung sounds from most children using a digital stethoscope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: