In vitro study assessing hydraulic calcium silicate cements' effectiveness for repairing internal resorption in tooth replicas, indicating variability by defect location.
Introduction: Effective repair of perforating internal resorption (PIR) requires adequate defect filling; however, the influence of defect location on the filling ability of hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSCs) remains unclear.This micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) study evaluated Bio-C Repair (BCR), Biodentine (BD), and white MTA-Angelus (WMTA) in 3D-printed tooth replicas with PIR defects in different root thirds.The null hypothesis was that material performance would not differ according to defect location.Methodology: A maxillary central incisor was instrumented to size R50 and scanned by micro-CT.PIR defects were digitally created in the apical, middle, and cervical thirds.Ninety replicas were printed and distributed by defect location (n = 30) and HCSC type (n = 10).After obturation, scans quantified cement-filling and extrusion.Surface characteristics were assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy.Data were analyzed with Welch's ANOVA with Games-Howell post hoc and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p < .05). Results:In apical PIRs, WMTA achieved greater filling and sealing than BCR and BD (p < 0.05), including superior filling of the adjacent apical canal (p < 0.001).No differences were observed in the middle third (p > 0.05).In cervical PIRs, all materials showed high filling, although BD exhibited greater extrusion than WMTA (p < 0.01).BCR presented higher surface roughness in apical PIRs (p < 0.05). Conclusions:HCSC performance in PIR repair was influenced by defect location.WMTA demonstrated more predictable apical adaptation, whereas BD showed greater cervical extrusion under simulated periodontal conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torres-Carrillo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: