Correction: Beyond colonoscopy, faecal DNA mutation screening provides a potential and viable path to early colorectal cancer detection

Furthermore, in the Results section, Supplementary S3 should also be cited in the sentence: "These frequencies are further detailed in, including patient-level detection and classification data." which now reads: "These frequencies are further detailed in Supplementary S3, including patient-level detection and classification data."In Addition, in the Discussion section, the Reference citations were incorrect, where "In one large clinical series, 16% of screened individuals tested positive by a stool DNA assay, and among those, roughly two-thirds had neoplasia confirmed on followup colonoscopy (overall PPV 67% for any colorectal neoplasia) . " nowreads: "In one large clinical series, 16% of screened individuals tested positive by a stool DNA assay, and among those, roughly two-thirds had neoplasia confirmed on follow up colonoscopy (overall PPV 67% for any colorectal neoplasia) 21,48 " Finally, References 49, 50 and 51 were duplicated versions of References 24, 20 and 21 respectively and have now been removed.