Purpose: Simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation (SLK) eligible candidates may receive SLK or liver-alone transplant (LA) with access to kidney transplant after initial LA (KAL). We aimed to characterize SLK-eligible recipient outcomes according to treatment approach. Methods: This study utilized 2017–2023 SRTR data to identify SLK-eligible deceased donor liver transplants. Recipients were placed into two groups based on whether SLK was performed; non-SLK patients were sub-stratified into LA and KAL cohorts. After baseline comparisons, 2-year patient and graft survival outcomes were characterized by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: Among 4879 candidates identified, 3746 (76.8%) underwent SLK, 1023 (21.0%) LA, and 110 (2.3%) KAL. SLK recipients maintained the highest eGFRs at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-transplant (p < 0.01). Compared to SLK recipients, non-SLK recipients had a higher 2-year risk of mortality (aHR 2.46, p < 0.01), all-cause events (aHR 1.91, p < 0.01), and liver graft failure (HR 1.55, p = 0.02). LA conferred a higher 2-year mortality risk (aHR 2.98, p < 0.01) and all-cause event risk (aHR 2.25, p < 0.01), while KAL had comparable mortality risk to SLK (aHR 0.43, p = 0.40). Conclusions: When SLK-eligible candidates undergo transplants, SLK remains the optimal path forward, even when a safety net kidney can be performed.
Shah et al. (Wed,) studied this question.