PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026BMC Public Health0 citationsOpen Access

Strategies and interventions to reduce children’s vulnerability to climate change: a scoping review

GSGholam-abbas ShiraliAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesHJHabib JalilianAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesGGGholamreza GoudarziAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify and categorize strategies that mitigate the health effects of climate change on children.
  • Conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O’Malley framework.
  • Performed a systematic search of PubMed and Scopus for studies published from 2015 to 2025.
  • Included studies that reported on climate-related health interventions for children aged 0-18 years.
  • A total of 33 studies were identified, with a focus on preventive strategies addressing air pollution, heat, and vector-borne diseases.
  • Community-level interventions were predominant, while individual and mental health strategies were less frequently reported.
  • Identified evidence gaps included a lack of focus on infants, marginalized groups, and urban poor children.

Abstract

Climate change presents serious risks to children’s health worldwide, highlighting the need for effective interventions. This study aimed to map and categorize strategies that reduce the health impacts of climate change on children. A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley framework. A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus identified peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2015 and 2025. Studies focusing on children and adolescents (0–18 years) and reporting climate-related health interventions, strategies, or policy responses were eligible for inclusion. A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Identified interventions were categorized into seven groups: preventive, adaptive, integrated preventive–adaptive, community-based, educational and awareness-based, mental health resilience, and disaster preparedness interventions. Most studies focused on preventive strategies, particularly those addressing exposure to air pollution, heat, and vector-borne diseases. Community-level interventions were predominant, while individual-level, structural, and mental health–focused strategies were less frequently reported. Methodological rigor varied across studies, with economic modeling approaches generally providing stronger evidence than many behavioral or community-based programs. Significant evidence gaps were identified, particularly concerning infants, marginalized populations, and urban poor children. Current evidence highlights a predominance of preventive and community-based approaches to reducing children’s vulnerability to climate change, alongside notable gaps in equity-focused and mental health interventions. More integrated, multi-level strategies supported by standardized evaluation frameworks are needed to strengthen the effectiveness and equity of climate-related health interventions for children.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shirali et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b83de7dec685947aacd5https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-27472-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper