PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice0 citationsOpen Access

Development and validation of the felt safeness in the therapeutic relationship questionnaire

View Full Paper
EHEmily HesselinkUniversity of BathJLJasmin Langdon-DalyUniversity of Bath

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop and assess the Felt Safeness in the Therapeutic Relationship Questionnaire (FSTRQ) to measure social safeness in therapy.
  • 226 participants completed online questionnaires including the FSTRQ and measures of related constructs.
  • Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to evaluate the one-factor structure of the FSTRQ.
  • Reliability and validity were assessed through correlational analyses.
  • The CFA indicated adequate fit for the one-factor model based on the FSTRQ data.
  • Cronbach's alpha was 0.96, demonstrating high reliability.
  • Strong correlations supported convergent validity with therapeutic alliance, while no correlations were found with negative affect or worry.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate the Felt Safeness in the Therapeutic Relationship Questionnaire (FSTRQ), a novel measure of someone's sense of social safeness within the therapeutic relationship. METHOD: 226 participants completed online questionnaires including FSTRQ and measures of overall social safeness, therapeutic alliance, positive/negative affect and worry. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) examined the fit of the study data to a hypothesised one-factor structure. Reliability statistics were calculated, and correlational analyses were used to explore convergent and discriminant validity. RESULTS: The CFA showed an adequate model fit of the one-factor structure to the data from the FSTRQ. Cronbach's alpha for the measure was 0.96. Convergent and divergent validity were supported by strong correlations with the questionnaire related to therapeutic alliance, moderate correlations to the SSPS and positive affect subscale and no correlations with negative affect and worry. CONCLUSION: This study showed good validity and reliability of the FSTRQ as a unique measure of felt safeness in the therapeutic relationship.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hesselink et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b888e7dec685947ab09bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/papt.70078
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests1951 · 43,882 citations
  2. 2Short and sweet: Comparing strategies for the reduction of questionnaires on self‐criticism and social safeness while preserving construct validity2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3The Relationship between Mutual Family Relations and Child Psychopathology1998 · 46 citations
  4. 4Development and validation of the penn state worry questionnaire1990 · 5,166 citations
  5. 5blandr: Bland-Altman Method Comparison2017 · 66 citations