ABSTRACT The Non‐Fungible Token (NFT) market exhibits sustained activity, with secondary trading accounting for the majority of overall volume and creator revenue in recent years. Unlike primary mints of untraded NFTs, secondary purchases involve tokens with established ownership transfer histories recorded transparently and immutably on the blockchain. This study examines how these transaction histories shape consumers' value perceptions and purchase intentions. Based on a social value lens and cue‐utilization theory, we propose that transaction histories serve as diagnostic cues signaling perceived popularity, thereby enhancing social value and driving purchase intentions. Three preregistered experiments with NFT‐experienced participants support this framework. We find that traded (vs. untraded) NFTs elicit higher purchase intentions, an effect that emerges even with a single prior transaction and does not significantly increase with more transactions (Study 1). This relationship is serially mediated by perceived popularity and social value (Study 2). Furthermore, the effect is stronger when transaction histories are recent (vs. outdated) (Study 3). These findings highlight the psychological mechanisms underlying secondary market dominance in NFTs, emphasizing verifiable transaction records as key to fostering perceived community endorsement in liquid digital consumption contexts. The results offer implications for NFT ecosystem strategies, such as prioritizing active trading to sustain social value and long‐term viability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b8a7e7dec685947ab2cd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.70174
Zhichen Hu
Minzu University of China
B X
Beijing Institute of Technology
Rubing Bai
Shandong University of Science and Technology
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
Beijing Institute of Technology
Guangxi University
Shandong University of Science and Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...