Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preclinical trial demonstrates improved angular accuracy in dental implant placements using a low-cost sensor system, suggesting enhanced usability in clinical settings.
Background: Accurate three-dimensional positioning of dental implants is critical for ensuring biomechanical stability, prosthetic passivity, and long-term clinical success. While computer-assisted navigation systems achieve high precision, their complexity and cost often limit accessibility. This study presents the development and preclinical experimental validation of a low-cost prototype designed to enhance angular accuracy in dental implant placement within a controlled 3D haptic simulation environment. Methods: A preclinical experimental design was implemented using a 3D haptic simulator (Virteasy, Montpellier, France). The prototype incorporated high-precision inertial measurement units (IMUs) and an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) for real-time angular feedback. Ninety-seven simulated implant placements were performed—both freehand and with prototype assistance—under identical virtual conditions by a single experienced operator. Angular deviations in mesiodistal and buccolingual planes were recorded, combined into a composite 3D index, and analyzed using paired t-tests and linear mixed-effects models. The study was conducted in a controlled simulation environment, which does not fully replicate clinical conditions. Results: The prototype significantly reduced angular deviation from 13.49° to 2.99° in the mesiodistal plane (−77.8%) and from 13.56° to 5.59° in the buccolingual plane (−58.8%), achieving an overall 67% improvement in three-dimensional orientation (p < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 1.47). Agreement with an optical reference system (OptiTrack) was excellent (bias = +0.36°, RMSE = 0.39°). Intra-operator reliability exceeded 0.95 (ICC), confirming strong reproducibility and measurement stability. Conclusions: The proposed inertial sensor-based prototype achieved angular accuracy within the range reported for computer-guided systems while maintaining advantages of portability, low cost, and usability. Its integration into haptic simulators provides a valid tool for both educational and preclinical applications, offering real-time feedback that enhances spatial perception and psychomotor learning. Future clinical studies should validate its performance in cadaveric and patient-based contexts to determine its practical impact on surgical precision and implant success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: