PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Australian Energy Producers journal.0 citations

Tracers for potential gas reservoir-aquifer leakage: 87Sr/86Sr

View Full Paper
JPJ. K. PearceThe University of QueenslandGDG. K. W. DawsonThe University of QueenslandMMM. MatsuiThe University of Queensland

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the effectiveness of strontium isotopes (87Sr/86Sr) in identifying gas reservoir-aquifer leakage.
  • Characterization of 87Sr/86Sr signatures and sources in rock cores and interburden of the Springbok Sandstone and Walloon Coal Measures.
  • Performed core whole rock digestions and acid extractions for isotopic analysis.
  • Measured 87Sr/86Sr signatures in groundwater from the Springbok Sandstone and WCM.
  • Signed range of whole rock 87Sr/86Sr from 0.703–0.710 and acid extracts from 0.7032–0.7048.
  • Groundwater measurements from WCM and Springbok overlap in the range of 0.7034–0.7043.
  • Suggests overlapping signatures could be due to similar rock formations rather than actual leakage.

Abstract

Groundwater tracers such as strontium isotopes (87Sr/86Sr) are increasingly used by governments and regulators to identify gas reservoir-aquifer leakage or connectivity. For example, they are used to identify potential connectivity between the Surat Basin Walloon Coal Measures (WCM) coal seam gas (CSG) reservoir and the overlying Springbok Sandstone aquifer. Generally, values of the 87Sr/86Sr signature of groundwaters sampled from the Springbok Sandstone that are overlapping with the CSG reservoir have been interpreted as a potential leak. However, overlapping 87Sr/86Sr signatures may not be an indicator of connectivity/leakage, rather of similar rock formations/mineral sources. 87Sr/86Sr signatures of groundwater can be a combination of recharge water and its interaction with the host rock. This study characterised 87Sr/86Sr signatures and sources in rock cores and interburden of the Springbok Sandstone and WCM. Both formations have a wide range of mineral components, with calcite and plagioclase potential Sr sources, and clays and K-feldspars Rb sources. Core whole rock digestions and acid extractions were characterised, with whole rock signature 87Sr/86Sr = 0.703–0.710 and acid extracts 0.7032–0.7048. Our recent groundwater measurements from the WCM and Springbok Sandstone aquifer overlap in the range 0.7034–0.7043. The overlapping signatures from acid extractions of the WCM and Springbok Sandstone indicate that the similarity of the two host formations may be the reason for overlapping groundwater signatures, not necessarily any occurring leakage. Future work should expand the study sites and also investigate reservoir aquifer pairs in the Bowen Basin.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pearce et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b928e7dec685947abacehttps://doi.org/10.1071/ep25077
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper