Demonstrates predictive measures for coronary artery perforation control, suggesting enhanced interventional approaches.
Background: Coronary artery perforation is a potentially life-threatening complication in 0.2–0.6% of all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite the ongoing development of technical skills and coronary devices, severe recalcitrant calcified coronary lesions remain a challenge for interventional cardiologists and can carry a potential risk for life-threatening complications, including coronary perforation. Discussion and Conclusion: The algorithm for cardiac vessel perforation could be more comprehensive and cover preventive and predictive measures. It is necessary to take into consideration prompt recognition, implement actions to restabilize the hemodynamic status, understand the source and mechanism of bleeding, and classify the cause of bleeding into proximal, distal, coronary artery bypass graft and collateral vessel, pericardial, myocardial extravasation, and vessel-chamber perforation, as each causality would necessitate a different management strategy for a successful outcome. Imaging information about cardiac vessel injury is useful for a better understanding of the spatial orientation of the coronary vessels. It also helps to detect a hematoma that deteriorates the hemodynamic status without effusion “dry tamponade” and could have a particular role in cardiac interventions to predict and prevent this complication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elhakim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: