PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Annals of the ICRP0 citations

Justification and optimisation of paediatric CT in prefectures around Tokyo

View Full Paper
ROR. OkamotoOMO. MiyazakiMKM. Kitamura

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the adherence to justification and optimisation principles in paediatric CT imaging.
  • Survey conducted among 169 physicians and 172 radiology technologists in Tokyo emergency hospitals.
  • Assessment of knowledge of guidelines and imaging methods for paediatric acute abdomen.
  • Evaluation of exposure doses from CT scans.
  • Fewer than 50% of physicians were aware of guidelines for acute appendicitis; CT utilisation at 17%.
  • Ultrasound was the most common first imaging test, performed in 77% of cases.
  • 93% of technologists knew the diagnostic reference level (DRL), with 83% applying optimisation at facilities.

Abstract

Background Although ‘justification’ and ‘optimisation’ are recommended as principles for reducing paediatric medical exposure, it is unclear whether these are actually implemented in general hospitals. Method Targeting emergency hospitals in the Tokyo area, we conducted a survey on the current status of paediatric acute abdomen, including diagnostic imaging methods used by physicians ( n = 169) and exposure doses from CT scans employed by radiology technologists ( n = 172). Results Fewer than half of physicians were aware of the guidelines for acute appendicitis, and utilisation was very low at 17%. However, ultrasound was the most commonly performed first imaging test at 77%. On the other hand, among technologists, 93% were aware of Japan's diagnostic reference level (DRL), and optimisation was applied at 83% of facilities. Otherwise, there were some facilities that used high-dose settings that exceeded the DRL, indicative of a trend towards a long-tailed distribution. Discussion Although awareness of the diagnostic guidelines was low, they were already being justified in general hospitals. As the guidelines become more widely known, the number of CT imaging phases may be further reduced. DRL was widely used and optimised. However, some facilities used high radiation settings, and these cannot be ignored.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Okamoto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b95be7dec685947abf09https://doi.org/10.1177/01466453251412501
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study2012 · 3,706 citations
  2. 2Hospital type predicts computed tomography use for pediatric appendicitis2018 · 33 citations
  3. 3The present state of radiation exposure from pediatric CT examinations in Japan—what do we have to do?2018 · 26 citations
  4. 4The Use of Computed Tomography in Pediatrics and the Associated Radiation Exposure and Estimated Cancer Risk2013 · 1,476 citations
  5. 5Image Gently: Ten Steps You Can Take to Optimize Image Quality and Lower CT Dose for Pediatric Patients2010 · 304 citations