PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer2 citationsOpen Access

Synthetic DNA vaccine platform elicits potent immunity where electroporated naked-mRNA is non-immunogenic

View Full Paper
CTClaudia ToniniABAndrea BianchiMEMauro Esposito

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the immunogenicity and effectiveness of a synthetic DNA vaccine platform in comparison to electroporated mRNA vaccines.
  • Developed an hpDNA vaccine encoding 20 neoantigens, delivered intramuscularly by electroporation.
  • Assessed immune responses through various techniques including enzyme-linked immunospot and single-cell RNA sequencing.
  • Evaluated anti-tumor activity in different mouse models.
  • hpDNA and pDNA vaccines generated robust T-cell responses, significantly protecting against tumors.
  • Electroporated mRNA did not induce detectable immunity, despite transgene expression.
  • hpDNA triggered a pro-inflammatory profile, leading to effective CD8+ T cell expansion and memory formation.

Abstract

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed cancer therapy, yet many patients fail to respond, underscoring the need for complementary strategies. Personalized neoantigen cancer vaccines (NCVs), which stimulate highly specific T-cell responses against tumor-specific mutations, are a promising approach now advancing in clinical development. Methods We developed a clinically scalable platform based on high-purity linear hairpin DNA (hpDNA), produced by an entirely cell-free enzymatic method and delivered intramuscularly by electroporation (EP). An M20-hpDNA vaccine, encoding 20 neoantigens from the MC38 tumor model, was benchmarked against a plasmid DNA (pDNA) counterpart and a pseudouridine-modified messenger RNA (mRNA) version delivered by EP. Immune responses were characterized by enzyme-linked immunospot, flow cytometry, bulk RNA sequencing, and single-cell RNA/T-cell receptor sequencing. Antitumor activity was assessed in prophylactic, therapeutic, and metastatic mouse models. Results hpDNA and pDNA vaccines elicited robust and comparable CD8 + and CD4 + neoantigen-specific T-cell responses, leading to dose-dependent protection in both prophylactic and therapeutic settings. In contrast, pseudouridine-modified mRNA vaccine delivered by EP failed to elicit detectable immunity despite measurable transgene expression. Transcriptomic profiling revealed that hpDNA, but not EP-delivered mRNA, triggered a pro-inflammatory signature, including Il6, Ccl4, Cxcl2, Cd80, and Spp1. Single-cell sequencing of Adpgk-specific CD8 + T cells showed expansion of memory subsets and unique hyperexpanded clonotypes. Functionally, M20-hpDNA prevented lung metastases in a mixed-modality protocol and synergized with α-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 therapy. Efficacy was further confirmed with C20-hpDNA, encoding 20 CT26-specific neoantigens. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that hpDNA delivered by EP is a versatile, potent, and clinically scalable platform for personalized NCVs. Under the delivery conditions tested here, EP-delivered, non-formulated mRNA did not elicit detectable antigen-specific T-cell responses, whereas hpDNA induces productive inflammation and durable T-cell memory. These results highlight the importance of delivery context in shaping vaccine immunogenicity and support further development of hpDNA as a safe and competitive strategy for individualized cancer immunotherapy. Importantly, our data do not challenge the well-established immunogenicity and clinical activity of formulated mRNA vaccines (eg, mRNA-lipid nanoparticle) in infectious disease and cancer settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tonini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b983e7dec685947ac298https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2025-013812
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper