Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates cooling efficiency in humid climates, highlighting superior performance of novel configurations.
This paper proposed a novel desiccant evaporative cooling system integrated with shallow geothermal energy with three different configurations. The first two configurations (I and II) employed shallow geothermal energy for precooling and post-cooling, respectively, while Configuration III utilised geothermal energy for both precooling and post-cooling. The performance of these systems was examined and compared to a benchmark system, a conventional solid desiccant M-cycle cooling system, under various operating conditions. Furthermore, a case study was conducted to evaluate the viability of these schemes under a hot and humid climate in Darwin, Australia. The results indicated that all three configurations outperformed the benchmark system regarding supply air conditions and required a lower regeneration temperature to achieve similar cooling performance. Configurations I and III could maintain the supply air humidity rate below 15 g/kg and contribute up to 30.46% of dehumidification performance through the condensation effect in humid conditions. Configuration III exhibited the highest energy efficiency, with a thermal COP up to 0.82 under different humidity levels, and this system also consumed 37.27% less water than the benchmark system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: