Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We previously demonstrated that supraphysiological insulin concentrations reduced the plasma 34K insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGF-BP) concentrations in humans. In this study we examined whether physiological changes in plasma insulin concentrations regulate IGF-BP and, if so, whether the regulation is influenced by race, glucose tolerance, or rate of glucose metabolism. For these purposes we 1) analyzed the relationship between fasting plasma insulin and IGF-BP concentrations in 2 racial groups (23 caucasians and 35 southwestern American Indians), 2) measured the response of plasma IGF-BP to oral glucose in 20 normal subjects, and 3) determined the dose-response characteristics of plasma IGF-BP to glucose and insulin in 23 normal subjects at 4 different insulin and glucose concentrations. The fasting plasma insulin concentration was inversely related to the plasma IGF-BP concentration in both the caucasian and Indian groups (P less than 0.0001). In the caucasian group the mean plasma IGF-BP concentration was higher [15 +/- 4 (+/- SE) micrograms/L] than in the Indian group (8 +/- 2 micrograms/L; P less than 0.05). This difference was independent of race and glucose tolerance, and it could be explained by lower plasma insulin concentrations in the caucasian (387 +/- 50 pmol/L) than in the Indian group (215 +/- 43 pmol/L; P less than 0.001). After oral glucose administration, the insulin concentration (423 +/- 72 pmol/L) was maximal 30 min after glucose treatment, and significant suppression of the IGF-BP concentration occurred at 90 min. Analysis of the dose-response curves revealed maximal suppression of IGF-BP at about 1150 pmol/L insulin, and half-maximal suppression at about 290 pmol/L. The plasma glucose concentration or the rate of glucose metabolism had no effect on the IGF-BP concentration. These data suggest that insulin is a major regulator of plasma IGF-BP concentrations under physiological conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suikkari et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: