The ‘observed’ π‐orbital energies ϵ v,j = −I v,j derived from the vertical ionization potentials obtained by a photoelectron spectroscopic investigation of the acenes benzene A(1), naphthalene A(2), anthracene A(3), naphthacene A(4) and pentacene A(5) have been compared with π‐orbital energies calculated by three different approximations: (a) the standard Hückel HMO model; (b) a first‐order perturbation treatment, based on (a), that takes into account bond length changes which follow the ionization process; (c) a SCF π‐electron model of the type proposed by Pople and by Pariser & Parr . In agreement with previous experience it is found that model (b) yields the most satisfactory parametrization of the experimental data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: