The heat capacities of ZrH2 and ZrD2 were measured in an adiabatic type calorimeter from 5 to 350°K. X-ray analyses showed the hydrides consist of a single face-centered tetragonal phase. The data for both compounds below 11°K were found to fit the equation Cv=9.8×10—4T+464.6(T/θ)3 cal deg—1 mole—1, where θ=311.4, and this equation was used to extrapolate the heat capacities below 6°K. Between 20 and 100°K the Cp of ZrD2 averages 1% lower than that of ZrH2 but above 110°K the Cp of ZrD2 becomes increasingly greater than that of ZrH2. At 298.15°K the heat capacities and thermodynamic functions calculated from the data are Cp=7.396±0.015 cal deg—1 mole—1, S°=8.374±0.02 cal deg—1 mole—1, H°—H0°=1284.1±2 cal mole—1, and (F°—H0°)/T=—4.067±0.01 cal deg—1 mole—1 for ZrH2, and 9.631±0.019, 9.168±0.02, 1474.4±3, and —4.223±0.01, respectively, for ZrD2. The free energy of formation of ZrH2 at 298.15°K is —30.9±2 kcal mole—1 and that of ZrD2 is —31.2±2. On the assumption that the difference in the heat capacity between the two isotopic compounds arises from a triply degenerate hydrogen vibration, it was found that the difference in the temperature range 100 to 350°K could be satisfactorily fitted by the difference between two Einstein heat capacity functions with a frequency of 1190±30 cm—1 for ZrH2 and 1190/√2 cm—1 for ZrD2. This result is compared with the optical lattice vibration frequency found by neutron scattering experiments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flotow et al. (1961) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: