Key result
IV disopyramide shows no benefit over placebo in preventing neurally mediated syncope during tilt testing.
Why the study?
Uncontrolled trials suggested disopyramide may be effective in neurally mediated syncope, prompting a randomized evaluation of its intravenous and oral efficacy against head-up tilt testing.
Does disopyramide prevent syncope or presyncope provoked by head-up tilt testing in patients with recurrent neurally mediated syncope?
RCT (n=22)
Double-blind
Crossover
Does disopyramide prevent syncope or presyncope provoked by head-up tilt testing in patients with recurrent neurally mediated syncope?
Absolute Event Rate: 60% vs 75%
p-value: p=0.55
Intravenous and oral disopyramide were ineffective in preventing neurally mediated syncope provoked by head-up tilt testing compared to placebo.
Disopyramide is ineffective in preventing tilt-induced neurally mediated syncope; challenges prior uncontrolled reports and does not support its routine use.
OBJECTIVES: A double-blind randomized trial was designed to determine the efficacy of intravenous and oral disopyramide phosphate in preventing neurally mediated syncope induced by a head-up tilt test. BACKGROUND: Neurally mediated syncope is a frequent cause of syncope and may be induced by head-up tilt testing. Recent uncontrolled trials have suggested that disopyramide may be an effective therapy in patients with neurally mediated syncope. METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive patients with recurrent neurally mediated syncope and two or more successive positive head-up tilt test responses were randomly allocated to receive either intravenous disopyramide or placebo. Head-up tilt testing at 60 degrees was performed for 15 min. If presyncope or syncope was not provoked, isoproterenol infusion was started at a rate of 1 microgram/min and the rate gradually increased until a 25% increase in heart rate was achieved. Eleven patients were subsequently randomized in crossover fashion to receive oral disopyramide (800 mg/day) or placebo during 1 week. The primary end point was prevention of syncope or presyncope provoked by head-up tilt testing. RESULTS: Head-up tilt test results were positive for syncope in 12 (75%) of 16 patients receiving intravenous placebo and in 12 (60%) of 20 patients receiving disopyramide (p = 0.55 Fisher exact test, 95% confidence interval [CI] -14% to 40%). In the intravenous phase, complete crossover was achieved in 15 patients. Head-up tilt test results during this phase were positive in 13 patients (87%) receiving placebo and in 12 patients (80%) receiving disopyramide (p = 0.50 Fisher exact test, 95% CI -19% to 32%) and were positive in all patients receiving their initially randomized drug or placebo. In the oral phase, head-up tilt results were positive in only two patients (18%) assigned to placebo and in three patients (27%) receiving disopyramide (p = 0.54 Fisher exact test, 95% CI -42% to 24%). A mean follow-up time of 29 +/- 8 months was obtained in 21 of the 22 patients. Syncope recurred in 3 (27%) of the 11 patients receiving disopyramide and 3 (30%) of the 10 patients not treated pharmacologically (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous disopyramide was ineffective for the prevention of neurally mediated syncope provoked by head-up tilt testing. No significant effect was observed after oral therapy with disopyramide. There was a striking decrease in the incidence of positive tilt test results over time regardless of intervention, thus discouraging the use of head-up tilt as the single method of assessing therapeutic efficacy. Recurrence of syncope after the investigative protocol was infrequent over long-term follow-up regardless of treatment group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morillo et al. (1993) conducted an RCT in Neurally mediated syncope (n=22). Disopyramide (intravenous and oral) vs. Placebo was evaluated on Prevention of syncope or presyncope provoked by head-up tilt testing (95% CI -14% to 40%, p=0.55). Intravenous disopyramide did not significantly prevent neurally mediated syncope provoked by head-up tilt testing compared to placebo (60% vs 75% positive tests; 95% CI -14% to 40%; P=0.55).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: