The Bayesian network-derived risk prediction model, PHORA, improved 1-year survival prediction in pulmonary arterial hypertension compared to REVEAL 2.0 (AUC 0.80 vs 0.76).
Observational
Yes
Does the PHORA Bayesian network model improve 1-year survival prediction compared to REVEAL 2.0 in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
The PHORA Bayesian network model provides superior discrimination for 1-year survival in PAH patients compared to the standard REVEAL 2.0 risk score.
Effect estimate: AUC
Absolute Event Rate: 0.8% vs 0.76%
BACKGROUND: Current risk stratification tools in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are limited in their discriminatory abilities, partly due to the assumption that prognostic clinical variables have an independent and linear relationship to clinical outcomes. We sought to demonstrate the utility of Bayesian network-based machine learning in enhancing the predictive ability of an existing state-of-the-art risk stratification tool, REVEAL 2.0. METHODS: We derived a tree-augmented naïve Bayes model (titled PHORA) to predict 1-year survival in PAH patients included in the REVEAL registry, using the same variables and cut-points found in REVEAL 2.0. PHORA models were validated internally (within the REVEAL registry) and externally (in the COMPERA and PHSANZ registries). Patients were classified as low-, intermediate- and high-risk (10% 12-month mortality, respectively) based on the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines. RESULTS: PHORA had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 for predicting 1-year survival, which was an improvement over REVEAL 2.0 (AUC 0.76). When validated in the COMPERA and PHSANZ registries, PHORA demonstrated an AUC of 0.74 and 0.80, respectively. 1-year survival rates predicted by PHORA were greater for patients with lower risk scores and poorer for those with higher risk scores (p<0.001), with excellent separation between low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups in all three registries. CONCLUSION: Our Bayesian network-derived risk prediction model, PHORA, demonstrated an improvement in discrimination over existing models. This is reflective of the ability of Bayesian network-based models to account for the interrelationships between clinical variables on outcome, and tolerance to missing data elements when calculating predictions.
Kanwar et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in pulmonary arterial hypertension. PHORA (tree-augmented naïve Bayes model) vs. REVEAL 2.0 was evaluated on 1-year survival (AUC). The Bayesian network-derived risk prediction model, PHORA, improved 1-year survival prediction in pulmonary arterial hypertension compared to REVEAL 2.0 (AUC 0.80 vs 0.76).