PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2016The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research40 citations

Comparison of Activity Profiles and Physiological Demands Between International Rugby Sevens Matches and Training

View Full Paper
DHDean G. HighamAustralian Sports CommissionDPDavid B. PyneGriffith UniversityJAJudith AnsonUniversity of Canberra

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Higham, DG, Pyne, DB, Anson, JM, Hopkins, WG, and Eddy, A. Comparison of activity profiles and physiological demands between international rugby sevens matches and training. J Strength Cond Res 30(5): 1287–1294, 2016—The specificity of contemporary training practices of international rugby sevens players is unknown. We quantified the positional group-specific activity profiles and physiological demands of on-field training activities and compared these with match demands. Twenty-two international matches and 63 rugby-specific training drills were monitored in 25 backs and 17 forwards from a national squad of male rugby sevens players over a 21-month period. Drills were classified into 3 categories: low-intensity skill refining (n = 23 drills, 560 observations), moderate- to high-intensity skill refining (n = 28 drills, 600 observations), and game simulation (n = 12 drills, 365 observations). Movement patterns (via Global Positioning System devices) and physiological load (via heart rate monitors) were recorded for all activities, and the differences between training and matches were quantified using magnitude-based inferential statistics. Distance covered in total and at ≥3.5 m·s−1, maximal velocity, and frequency of accelerations and decelerations were lower for forwards during competition compared with those for backs by a small but practically important magnitude. No clear positional group differences were observed for physiological load during matches. Training demands exceeded match demands only for frequency of decelerations of forwards during moderate- to high-intensity skill-refining drills and only by a small amount. Accelerations and distance covered at ≥6 m·s−1 were closer to match values for forwards than for backs during all training activities, but training drills consistently fell below the demands of international competition. Coaches could therefore improve physical and physiological specificity by increasing the movement demands and intensity of training drills.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Higham et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a075ffa72f0218126583aabhttps://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000000212
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reductions in pre-season training loads reduce training injury rates in rugby league players2004 · 143 citations
  2. 2Energy Cost and Metabolic Power in Elite Soccer2009 · 726 citations
  3. 3The Effect of Resisted Sprint Training on Speed and Strength Performance in Male Rugby Players2009 · 248 citations
  4. 4The influence of training with heavy rugby balls on selected spin pass variables in youth rugby union players2006 · 13 citations
  5. 5Muscular soreness following prolonged intermittent high-intensity shuttle running1999 · 185 citations