Key result
Ultrafast computed tomography accurately assessed left ventricular function compared to cardiac catheterization, demonstrating strong correlation for ejection fraction (r=0.86 for short-axis CT).
Why the study?
Does ultrafast CT accurately assess global and regional left ventricular function compared to cardiac catheterization in males with ischemic heart disease?
Observational (n=14)
Does ultrafast CT accurately assess global and regional left ventricular function compared to cardiac catheterization in males with ischemic heart disease?
Ultrafast CT provides an accurate non-invasive assessment of global and regional left ventricular function comparable to cardiac catheterization in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Supports non-invasive LV assessment in IHD; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Contrast-enhanced ultrafast computed tomography (CT) of the left ventricle was done in the long axis and short axis within one day of cardiac catheterization in 14 males with ischemic heart disease and a mean age of 58 years. Imaging was R wave-triggered at 58-msec intervals (13/level). Left ventriculography was performed in 30 degrees right anterior oblique (RAO) and 60 degrees left anterior oblique (LAO) caudal 12 degrees. CT left ventricular ejection fraction was measured using a modified Simpson's reconstruction of end-systolic and end-diastolic slices. Catheterization left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by area-length method. Six left ventricular segments (septal, apex, anterior, lateral, inferior, and posterior) were scored by different paired observers as follows: dyskinesis (-1), akinesis (0), moderate-severe hypokinesis (1), mild hypokinesis (2), and normal (3). Correlations of left ventricular ejection fraction for catheterization vs. long-axis CT and short-axis CT were r = .83 and r = .86, respectively. Seven of eight patients with transmural myocardial infarction were identified on CT by akinetic/dyskinetic segments. Eighty-four segments were scored. There was agreement (normal vs. abnormal) in 76 (90%). CT detected 47 normal segments vs. 51 by catheterization (92%), 11 akinetic/dyskinetic segments (92%), and 14 hypokinetic segments vs. 21 (67%). Wall motion scores between CT and catheterization differed by greater than 1 in 6 of 84 segments (7%). Therefore, ultrafast CT can accurately assess global and regional left ventricular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacMillan et al. (1988) conducted an observational in Ischemic heart disease (n=14). Contrast-enhanced ultrafast computed tomography vs. Cardiac catheterization was evaluated on Correlation of left ventricular ejection fraction and agreement in regional wall motion scores (r = 0.86). Ultrafast computed tomography accurately assessed left ventricular function compared to cardiac catheterization, demonstrating strong correlation for ejection fraction (r=0.86 for short-axis CT).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: