Key result
2023 Australian CVD Risk Calculator matches 2012 discrimination, overpredicting in males but improving female calibration.
Why the study?
A new Australian Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculator was released in July 2023 with the aim of improving predictive performance over its 2012 predecessor, but external validation was needed.
Does the 2023 Australian Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculator improve predictive performance for 5-year CVD events compared to the 2012 calculator in adults aged 55-85 years?
Cohort
No
Does the 2023 Australian Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculator improve predictive performance for 5-year CVD events compared to the 2012 calculator in adults aged 55-85 years?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The 2023 Australian CVD Risk Calculator provides similar discrimination to the 2012 version but overpredicts risk in males, highlighting the need for further nationwide validation.
BACKGROUND: The Australian Cardiovascular (CVD) Disease Risk Calculator is used to estimate the individual risk of developing cardiovascular disease in the next 5 years. A new version was recently published (July 2023), with the aim of improving on the predictive performance of its predecessor (released in 2012). We present the findings of an external validation study comparing the predictive performance of the 2023 and 2012 Australian CVD risk calculators using data prospectively collected in the Hunter Community Study (HCS; NSW Australia), a longitudinal community-based cohort of people aged 55-85 years. METHODS: We compared the risk predicted by the two calculators to the observed 5-year events in the HCS, in terms of discrimination (using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, AUROC), calibration (using observed vs expected, O/E, ratio), sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: Discrimination was very similar for the 2023 and 2012 calculators, with AUROC measured to be 0.71 95% confidence interval (CI; 0.66, 0.75) and 0.71 95% CI (0.67, 0.75), respectively. With the updated calculator, sensitivity was better in males, while specificity was better in females; there were also modest improvements in positive likelihood ratios for both males and females. The 2023 calculator was found to overpredict risk for males (O/E ratio 0.57, p<0.001), but was better calibrated for females (O/E ratio 1.02, p=0.46). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the 2023 calculator provides some improvements in the prediction of CVD, specifically the positive likelihood ratios. However, there are also benefits in observing the old 2012 calculator for some purposes and specific population groups. We find that there is a need for a larger, nationwide cohort to allow further external validation of the 2023 Australian CVD Risk Calculator.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barwick et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease. 2023 Australian Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculator vs. 2012 Australian Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculator was evaluated on Discrimination (AUROC) for 5-year cardiovascular events (AUROC, 95% CI 0.66-0.75). The 2023 Australian CVD Risk Calculator demonstrated similar discrimination to the 2012 version (AUROC 0.71 vs 0.71), with overprediction in males but better calibration in females.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: