Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Hydrogen storage remains the main barrier to the broader use of hydrogen as an energy carrier, despite hydrogen’s high energy density and clean combustion. This study presents a comparative evaluation of conventional and emerging storage methods, integrating thermodynamic, kinetic, economic, and environmental metrics to assess capacity, efficiency, cost, and reversibility. Physisorption analysis reveals that metal organic frameworks can achieve storage capacities up to 14. 0 mmol/g. Chemical storage systems are evaluated, including nanostructured MgH 2 (7. 6 wt%), catalyzed reversible complex hydrides, liquid organic hydrogen carriers, and clathrate hydrates. Techno-economic analysis shows storage costs from 500–700/kg H 2 to 30–50/kg H 2, with energy efficiencies of 50%–90%. Life cycle assessment identifies manufacturing as the primary source of emissions, with carbon footprints varying from 150 to 2057 kg CO 2 -eq/kg H 2. Cryo-compressed is the most practical transportation option while metal hydrides suit stationary use. This study provides a quantitative foundation to guide material selection and system design for next-generation hydrogen storage technologies. • Comprehensive evaluation of conventional and emerging hydrogen storage technologies. • Analysis of colloid and interface phenomena for hydrogen storage improvement. • Examination of hydrogen adsorption capacities of various advanced materials. • Identification of key performance gaps for practical hydrogen storage systems. • Future research directions bridging material innovation with system-level needs.
Laalam et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: