Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
To verify the usefulness of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and fiber tractography (FT) compared with routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cervical spinal cord injury, and to clarify the relationship between motor and sensory impairments and DTI and FT parameters, we performed routine MRI and DTI on 10 patients with chronic cervical spinal cord injury and on 10 controls. Quantitative parameters of DTI, such as fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), were calculated for each cervical cord level. FT parameters of imaginary crossing fiber numbers were also determined at the C3 level, from C3-C6, and from C3-C7, as well as each connection rate. All patients' clinical motor and sensory functions were examined using the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISCSCI). FA values in the controls and patients were 0.76 ± 0.08 (mean ± standard deviation) and 0.58 ± 0.11, respectively, and ADC values in the controls and patients were 1.29 ± 0.75 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec and 1.26 ± 0.66 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec, respectively. In patients with cervical cord injury, abnormal cervical levels detected on routine MRI were not correlated with clinical findings and DTI parameters, but FA of DTI was correlated with motor function, as were imaginary crossing fiber numbers and connection rates of FT. Quantitative DTI and FT analyses were useful in the evaluation of patients with cervical spinal cord injury. The injured cervical spinal cord can be evaluated in more detail and more precisely using DTI and FT, for which findings are correlated with clinical findings such as neurological impairments.
Chang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.