Long‐term clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy on stable knees are better for traumatic tears when compared to degenerative lesions: A systematic review

PURPOSE: An arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) for degenerative meniscus lesions and traumatic meniscus tears are two distinct entities and their long-term outcomes are rarely reported. The aim of this review was to compare the long-term (clinical and radiological) results of APM performed on stable knees for traumatic tears (TT) or degenerative lesions (DL). METHODS: Pubmed, Scopus and Embase databases were searched to identify relevant studies published between 2010 and 2023 using the keywords 'meniscectomy' OR 'meniscectomies' OR 'meniscal resection'. English-language, Levels I-IV evidence studies reporting either radiographic or clinical outcome measures with a minimum of 6 years' follow-up after APM were included. Studies including discoid meniscus, open meniscectomy, unstable knee and combination with other procedures were excluded. To rate the quality of evidence, the methodological index for non-randomized studies was used. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were included, with follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 22 years. Eleven studies dealt with TT with a mean age of 31.5 ± 6.6 years and a mean follow-up of 11.6 ± 6.9 years. At the last follow-up, radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) ranged from 36% to 76%, with an average rate of 48 ± 19%; functional scores ranged from 71 to 97, with a mean of 90 ± 4 for the Lysholm score, 86 ± 10 for the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and 94 ± 16 for the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome (KOOS). Twenty-one studies dealt with DL with a mean age of 49.9 ± 7.2 years and a mean follow-up of 14.9 ± 6.3 years. At the last follow-up, radiographic OA ranged from 23% to 97%, with an average rate of 77 ± 28%; functional scores ranged from 40 to 87, with a mean of 79 ± 10 for the Lysholm score and 71 ± 16 for the IKDC. CONCLUSION: Ten-year clinical outcomes of APM are better for TTs when compared to DLs. Rates of OA are difficult to compare but lower for TTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.