Key result
A cross-sectional survey of 102 Indian anesthesiologists revealed overall positive attitudes toward AI integration for perioperative care, though the majority expressed ethical concerns.
Why the study?
Despite the increasing importance of artificial intelligence in modern medicine, there is a dearth of knowledge regarding anesthesiologists' knowledge and perceptions of AI.
Cross-Sectional (n=102)
Open-label
Yes
Indian anesthesiologists generally view AI positively for improving precision and safety, despite holding some ethical and practical apprehensions.
Highlights need for ethical AI frameworks in perioperative care; leaves open broader validation beyond this Indian cohort.
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly gaining importance in modern medicine. Yet, there is a dearth of knowledge on what the anesthesiologists know and think about AI in context. The objective of the study was to find conceptual, contextual, and translational aspects of AI among current practitioners of anesthesiology. Methods: This investigator-initiated, open-label, analytical, cross-sectional, noninterventional study was conducted from February 15, 2024, to March 21, 2024, with personal pursuance on consenting practitioners of anesthesiology using pretested partially open-ended questionnaire from across India. Results: Among 102 respondent anesthesiologists from diverse domains of anesthesiology and wide spectrum of experience and expertise, the majority were in the fifth decade of life, male and qualified professionals; the minority were faculty members and had a decade of practicing experience. Their concepts on techniques, applications, and safety of AI including levels and potentials of use were significant so far as predictive algorithms, assessing vital parameters and perioperative care were concerned. Their attitude on techniques and applications of AI was overall positive on innovation, integration, and employment of algorithms to reduce adverse events and on the incorporation of capacity building as a doable entity. The intended practice was overall significant on techniques and putting into effect an update and institutional practices of AI including predicting problems in real-life practice. However, the majority was apprehensive on the use of AI aligning it with a machine and expressed ethical concerns. Conclusion: The respondents felt that innovation, integration, and implementation of AI in anesthesia can heighten precision and safety in rural and remote areas of all surgical specialties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitra et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Practicing anesthesiologists (n=102). Pretested partially open-ended questionnaire on Artificial Intelligence was evaluated on Conceptual, contextual, and translational aspects of AI. A cross-sectional survey of 102 Indian anesthesiologists revealed overall positive attitudes toward AI integration for perioperative care, though the majority expressed ethical concerns.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: