PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 30, 2009New England Journal of Medicine1,467 citationsOpen Access

Variation in Hospital Mortality Associated with Inpatient Surgery

View Full Paper
AGAmir A. GhaferiJBJohn D. BirkmeyerJDJustin B. Dimick

Key Result

Hospitals with very high overall mortality had significantly higher mortality among patients with major complications compared to very low mortality hospitals (21.4% vs 12.5%, P<0.001).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=84,730)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the effective management of complications explain the variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery?

P
Population
84,730 patients who had undergone inpatient general and vascular surgery from 2005 through 2007 (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program)
I
Intervention
Treatment at hospitals with very high overall mortality
C
Comparator
Treatment at hospitals with very low overall mortality
O
Outcome
Overall mortality, incidence of overall and major complications, and rate of death among patients with major complicationshard clinical

Hospital mortality variation in surgery is largely driven by differences in mortality among patients who develop major complications, highlighting the importance of timely recognition and management.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 21.4% vs 12.5%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital mortality that is associated with inpatient surgery varies widely. Reducing rates of postoperative complications, the current focus of payers and regulators, may be one approach to reducing mortality. However, effective management of complications once they have occurred may be equally important. METHODS: We studied 84,730 patients who had undergone inpatient general and vascular surgery from 2005 through 2007, using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We first ranked hospitals according to their risk-adjusted overall rate of death and divided them into five groups. For hospitals in each overall mortality quintile, we then assessed the incidence of overall and major complications and the rate of death among patients with major complications. RESULTS: Rates of death varied widely across hospital quintiles, from 3.5% in very-low-mortality hospitals to 6.9% in very-high-mortality hospitals. Hospitals with either very high mortality or very low mortality had similar rates of overall complications (24.6% and 26.9%, respectively) and of major complications (18.2% and 16.2%, respectively). Rates of individual complications did not vary significantly across hospital mortality quintiles. In contrast, mortality in patients with major complications was almost twice as high in hospitals with very high overall mortality as in those with very low overall mortality (21.4% vs. 12.5%, P<0.001). Differences in rates of death among patients with major complications were also the primary determinant of variation in overall mortality with individual operations. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to efforts aimed at avoiding complications in the first place, reducing mortality associated with inpatient surgery will require greater attention to the timely recognition and management of complications once they occur.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ghaferi et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Inpatient general and vascular surgery (n=84,730). Very high overall mortality hospitals vs. Very low overall mortality hospitals was evaluated on Mortality in patients with major complications (p=<0.001). Hospitals with very high overall mortality had significantly higher mortality among patients with major complications compared to very low mortality hospitals (21.4% vs 12.5%, P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a07b4f344ff8ad339f69ccehttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa0903048
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Variation in outcome of surgical procedures1994 · 92 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of the Complication Rate as a Measure of Quality of Care in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery1995 · 317 citations
  3. 3Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock: We could go faster2007 · 157 citations
  4. 4Hospital and Patient Characteristics Associated With Death After Surgery1992 · 959 citations
  5. 5Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 20082007 · 4,948 citations