Why the study?
People with serious mental illness have high rates of cardiometabolic illness and poor outcomes, but existing integrated care models have not consistently shown cardiometabolic improvements.
Does enhanced primary care improve cardiometabolic outcomes in patients with serious mental illness?
Does enhanced primary care improve cardiometabolic outcomes in patients with serious mental illness?
Enhanced primary care adapted for patients with serious mental illness achieves clinically meaningful improvements in cardiometabolic health, including reductions in systolic blood pressure.
Enhanced primary care was associated with modest cardiometabolic gains in serious mental illness; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
People with serious mental illness (SMI) have high rates of cardiometabolic illness, receive low quality care, and experience poor outcomes. Nevertheless, studies of existing integrated care models have not consistently shown improvements in cardiometabolic health for people with SMI. This study assessed the effect of a novel model of enhanced primary care for people with SMI on cardiometabolic outcomes. Enhanced primary care is a model of integrated care wherein comprehensive primary care delivery is adapted to the needs of people with SMI in coordination with behavioral care. We conducted a propensity-weighted cohort study comparing 234 patients with SMI receiving enhanced primary care to 4,934 patients with SMI receiving usual primary care using electronic health data from a large academic medical system covering the years 2014-2018. The propensity-weighted models controlled for baseline differences in outcome measures and patient characteristics between groups. by 0.27 percentage points (CI, -0.47 to -0.060) and systolic blood pressure by 3.9 mm Hg (CI, -5.2 to -2.5) compared to usual primary care. We did not find evidence that enhanced primary care consistently affected glucose screening, LDL values, or diastolic blood pressure. Enhanced primary care can achieve clinically meaningful improvements in cardiometabolic health compared to usual primary care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gertner et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: