Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This expert consensus statement provides updated guidance on the appropriate selection and use of ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring techniques for diagnosing arrhythmias and stratifying sudden cardiac death risk.
<ns3:p>The latest consensus of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology (ISHNE) and Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) expert group regarding the usefulness of ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry (AECG) has been published in 2017. The aim of the ISHNE-HRS experts was to systematise current state of knowledge of AECG in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and to present the most recent development of technology in ECG monitoring. There was also shown the role of electrocardiography in correct diagnosis, therapy and risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in particular diseases. The authors emphasized the importance of selecting appropriate AECG techniques, taking into consideration the prevalence of symptoms/arrhythmias and possible limitations of each technique.</ns3:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bissinger et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: