Why the study?
What are the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of familial short QT syndrome?
What are the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of familial short QT syndrome?
Short QT syndrome is a distinct clinical entity characterized by familial sudden death, short refractory periods, and inducible ventricular fibrillation in young, otherwise healthy subjects.
May indicate high arrhythmic risk in affected families; leaves open optimal management pending larger prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: A prolonged QT interval is associated with a risk for life-threatening events. However, little is known about prognostic implications of the reverse-a short QT interval. Several members of 2 different families were referred for syncope, palpitations, and resuscitated cardiac arrest in the presence of a positive family history for sudden cardiac death. Autopsy did not reveal any structural heart disease. All patients had a constantly and uniformly short QT interval at ECG. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six patients from both families were submitted to extensive noninvasive and invasive work-up, including serial resting ECGs, echocardiogram, cardiac MRI, exercise testing, Holter ECG, and signal-averaged ECG. Four of 6 patients underwent electrophysiological evaluation including programmed ventricular stimulation. In all subjects, a structural heart disease was excluded. At baseline ECG, all patients exhibited a QT interval <or=280 ms (QTc <or=300 ms). During electrophysiological study, short atrial and ventricular refractory periods were documented in all and increased ventricular vulnerability to fibrillation in 3 of 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The short QT syndrome is characterized by familial sudden death, short refractory periods, and inducible ventricular fibrillation. It is important to recognize this ECG pattern because it is related to a high risk of sudden death in young, otherwise healthy subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaïta et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: