Key result
Right atrial flutter ablation is linked to a ~22% LVEF increase without advanced heart disease.
Why the study?
The study aimed to explore the effect of right atrial flutter ablation on left ventricular function in patients with or without advanced heart diseases.
Does ablation for right atrial flutter improve left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with symptomatic heart failure with or without advanced heart diseases?
Cohort (n=60)
Does ablation for right atrial flutter improve left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with symptomatic heart failure with or without advanced heart diseases?
Ablation of right atrial flutter leads to significant LVEF improvement in patients without advanced heart disease, whereas pre-ablation LVEDV ≥ 137 mL predicts lack of improvement.
Ablation-linked LVEF gains appear smaller with advanced heart disease; hypothesis-generating for LVEDV-guided selection pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter (AFL)-related tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TICM) is a treatable cause of heart failure (HF). This study aims to explore the effect of AFL ablation on left ventricular (LV) function in right AFL patients with or without advanced heart diseases. METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2019, 149 patients underwent ablation for persistent AFL. Among them, 60 patients with persistent right atrial (RA) flutter had symptomatic HF and elevated natriuretic peptide levels. Group 1 consisted of 35 patients without advanced heart diseases, and group 2 consisted of 25 patients with prior history of ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or surgery for valvular heart disease (VHD). Follow-up echocardiography was performed 6 months later. Improvement of LV performance was defined as LV ejection fraction (EF) increase ≥50% of baseline EF without clinical HF symptoms or LVEF recovery to ≥60%. RESULTS: Group 2 had larger LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and LV end-systolic volume than group 1. At follow-up, group 2 had larger LV end-systolic volume than group 1. Group 1 had more increase in LVEF than group 2 (21.7 ± 15.2% vs 4.1 ± 13.2%; P < .001). A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to determine the discrimination threshold of baseline LVEDV (137 mL) in the overall study group for improvement of LV performance after ablation (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Successful ablation for right AFL could achieve more reversal of LV dysfunction in patients without advanced heart diseases. Pre-ablation LVEDV ≥ 137 mL was associated with no improvement of LV performance after ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Persistent right atrial flutter with symptomatic heart failure (n=60). Ablation vs. Patients with advanced heart diseases was evaluated on Increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p=< .001). Successful ablation for right atrial flutter resulted in a greater increase in LVEF in patients without advanced heart diseases compared to those with advanced heart diseases (21.7% vs 4.1%; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: