Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Understanding of semiconductor breakdown under high electric fields is an important aspect of materials’ properties, particularly for the design of power devices. For decades, a power-law has been used to describe the dependence of material-specific critical electrical field ( Ecrit E crit ) at which the material breaks down and bandgap ( E g ) . The relationship is often used to gauge tradeoffs of emerging materials whose properties haven’t yet been determined. Unfortunately, the reported dependencies of Ecrit E crit on E g cover a surprisingly wide range in the literature. Moreover, Ecrit E crit is a function of material doping. Further, discrepancies arise in Ecrit E crit values owing to differences between punch-through and non-punch-through device structures. We report a new normalization procedure that enables comparison of critical electric field values across materials, doping, and different device types. An extensive examination of numerous references reveals that the dependence Ecrit E crit ∝ E g 1.83 best fits the most reliable and newest data for both direct and indirect semiconductors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slobodyan et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: