Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation research shifts from clinical events to digital accessibility, with ~85% published in recent decades.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation research has evolved since 1927, but a comprehensive summary of its publication history, keyword trends, and citations over time was needed.
Cardiac rehabilitation research has grown significantly over the past two decades, evolving from clinical event evaluation to digital interventions, though it remains dominated by high-income countries.
May prompt clinicians to explore digital cardiac rehabilitation tools; leaves open rigorous outcome trials in diverse settings.
Research into cardiac rehabilitation (CR), a key model for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, has evolved since first described in 1927. This review aimed to explore this evolution by identifying CR-related publications from the Web of Science Core Collection and summarizing CR research publication history, trends in publication keywords, and citations over time. A total of 8729 CR publications appeared across 1441 journals (median impact factor: 2.6) and were cited 315,819 times, with over 85% (7455/8729) published in the past two decades. These publications involved contributions from 26,909 authors across 120 countries, despite disproportionate domination by high-income countries. Publication keywords have consistently focused on exercise but have evolved from evaluating clinical events, quality-of-life, and return-to-work outcomes to improving accessibility using digital interventions. However, a broader focus on other cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, and various research designs may be needed to modernize CR, particularly in lower-income countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manandi et al. (2025) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease (n=8,729). Cardiac rehabilitation research was evaluated on Publication history, trends in publication keywords, and citations over time. Cardiac rehabilitation research across 8,729 publications has evolved from evaluating clinical events to improving accessibility using digital interventions, with >85% published in the past 20 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: