Key result
Center-based and home-based cardiac rehab are linked to 1-year fitness gains but not 5-year maintenance.
Why the study?
To examine whether patients who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation program after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome maintained cardiorespiratory fitness in the community.
Does center-based cardiac rehabilitation improve long-term cardiorespiratory fitness compared to home-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients after acute coronary syndrome?
Observational (n=78)
No
Does center-based cardiac rehabilitation improve long-term cardiorespiratory fitness compared to home-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients after acute coronary syndrome?
Cardiorespiratory fitness improvements from cardiac rehabilitation peak at 1 year and decline thereafter, highlighting the need for continuous support to maintain long-term fitness.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fitness gains after cardiac rehab may decline by 5 years; leaves open whether sustained programs improve long-term outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether patients who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome maintained cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in the community. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including 78 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery at our hospital's cardiovascular center and participated in a CR program and a 5-year follow-up evaluation. Patients were divided into a center-based CR (CBCR) group, participating in an electrocardiography-monitored exercise training in a hospital setting, and a home-based CR (HBCR) group, receiving aerobic exercise training and performed self-exercise at home. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between groups (p>0.05), except the proportion of non-smokers (CBCR 59.5% vs. HBCR 31.7%; p=0.01). In both groups, the maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) increased significantly during the first 12 weeks of follow-up and remained at a steady state for the first year, but it decreased after the 1-year follow-up. Particularly, VO2max at 5 years decreased below the baseline value in the HBCR group. In the low CRF group, the CRF level significantly improved at 12 weeks, peaked at 1 year, and was still significantly different from the baseline value after 5 years. The high CRF group did not show any significant increase over time relative to the baseline value, but most patients in the high CRF group maintained relatively appropriate CRF levels after 5 years. CONCLUSION: Continuous support should be provided to patients to maintain optimal CRF levels after completing a CR program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome post-revascularization (n=78). Center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) vs. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) was evaluated on Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) at 5 years (mL/kg/min) (p=>0.05). Both center-based and home-based cardiac rehabilitation improved cardiorespiratory fitness for up to 1 year, but neither group maintained these optimal fitness levels at the 5-year follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: