Key result
Radial artery diameter <1.8 mm predicts significant radial-to-femoral pressure gradients in ~48% of patients.
Why the study?
Radial-to-femoral pressure gradients occur in about one-third of cardiac surgical patients, prompting investigation into whether preoperative radial artery diameter predicts this gradient and the clinical impact of femoral versus radial arterial catheterization on vasoactive support.
Does the use of a single radial arterial catheter compared to dual radial and femoral catheters increase vasopressor requirements in cardiac surgical patients?
Cohort (n=309)
Does the use of a single radial arterial catheter compared to dual radial and femoral catheters increase vasopressor requirements in cardiac surgical patients?
p-value: p=0.016
Relying solely on a radial arterial catheter during cardiac surgery may lead to overestimation of hypotension and unnecessary vasopressor use due to radial-to-femoral pressure gradients, particularly in patients with small radial arteries.
Background: A radial-to-femoral pressure gradient (RFPG) can occur in roughly one-third of cardiac surgical patients. Such a gradient has been associated with smaller stature and potentially smaller radial artery diameter. We hypothesized that preoperative radial artery diameter could be a predictor of RFPG. We also investigated the clinical impact of using a femoral versus a radial arterial catheter in terms of vasoactive support. Methods: Using ultrasound, we measured the bilateral radial artery diameters of 160 cardiac surgical patients. All arterial pressure values were continuously recorded. Significant RFPG was defined as ≥25 mm Hg in systolic and/or ≥10 mm Hg in mean arterial pressure. One hundred and forty-nine additional patients were used to validate the impact of our observations. Results: = .016) despite undergoing shorter and less complex procedures. In the validation cohort, similar observations were made, and patients with a radial artery catheter received a longer duration of vasoactive support in the intensive care unit. Conclusions: A significant RFPG occurs in one-third of cardiac surgical patients and in 48% of those with a radial artery diameter <1.8 mm. The use of a single radial arterial catheter instead of dual radial and femoral catheters was associated with greater vasopressor requirements in the operating room and in the intensive care unit. We do not recommend the use of a single radial artery catheter in cardiac surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bouchard-Dechêne et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Cardiac surgery (n=309). Single radial arterial catheter vs. Dual radial and femoral catheters was evaluated on Significant radial-to-femoral pressure gradient (≥25 mm Hg systolic and/or ≥10 mm Hg mean arterial pressure) (p=0.016). A radial artery diameter <1.8 mm predicted a significant radial-to-femoral pressure gradient in 48% of patients, and single radial catheters were associated with greater vasopressor requirements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: