Why the study?
Does repeat DES implantation improve clinical outcomes compared to balloon angioplasty alone in patients with DES restenosis?
Does repeat DES implantation improve clinical outcomes compared to balloon angioplasty alone in patients with DES restenosis?
A default strategy of repeat DES implantation for DES restenosis does not appear advantageous over balloon angioplasty alone and may be associated with a higher risk of myocardial infarction.
May warrant caution with repeat DES in restenosis; leaves open optimal strategy pending randomized trials.
AIMS: To evaluate clinical outcome of patients undergoing repeated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for drug-eluting stent (DES) restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 213 patients who underwent re-PCI for DES restenosis. The study population was divided in two groups according to the treatment strategy: 94 patients were treated with at least one repeat DES implantation (DES-sandwich group); 119 patients were treated with balloon angioplasty alone (BA group). Diffuse pattern of restenosis was more frequent in DES-sandwich group (34.0% vs. 17.6%; P=0.006). During a median follow-up of 20.2 months (interquartile range 13.7 to 30.1), the incidence of cardiac death was 6.5% in the DES-sandwich and 2.5% in the BA group (P=0.18), the incidence of myocardial infarction 6.5% and 0.8% (P=0.04), and the incidence of TLR 13% and 10.9% (P=0.63), respectively. After adjustment for angiographic characteristics, DES-sandwich strategy tended to be associated with a higher rate of myocardial infarction (OR 8.2, 95%CIs[0.9-69.6]; P=0.05). By multivariate analysis, early and diffuse pattern of restenosis were found as predictors of adverse outcome at follow-up (OR 4.7, 95%CI[2.2-9.6], P<0.001; OR 2.3, 95%CI[1.1-4.8], P=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A default strategy of repeat DES implantation does not seem to be advantageous and could be associated with a higher rate of myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tagliareni et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: