Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper gives an experimentally supported review and comparison of several indices based on the conventional K-means inertia criterion for determining the number of clusters, K , in datasets, using the popular Silhouette width index as a benchmark. Our experiments involve a novel version of the Elbow index, defined using values of K two or three steps apart. We also discuss alternative ways of computing the inertia and summarizing its values. Even though there are no overall winners in our experiments, some of our results are very conclusive and can be used as a guide for indices determining the number of clusters in K-means.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rykov et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: