Randomized trial evaluates personalized radiation therapy's safety and impact on survival in glioblastoma patients, suggesting potential benefits.
Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive primary brain tumor with near-universal recurrence despite maximal safe resection followed by standard chemoradiation. We conducted a prospective pilot study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03477513) with predefined endpoints and structured dose-escalation criteria to evaluate the feasibility and safety of personalized precision radiation therapy (PPRT) guided by machine learning (ML)-based maps of tumor infiltration. Twenty patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma who underwent gross total resection received PPRT with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. The primary outcomes were median progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Secondary outcomes included patterns of recurrence, rate of clinically significant toxicity, and median overall survival (OS). PPRT was feasible and well tolerated, with no grade ≥3 acute adverse events; 47% experienced grade 1 and 53% grade 2 events. Following therapy, radiation necrosis occurred in 47% of PPRT-temozolomide patients versus 12% in standard-of-care patients (p < 0.001). Median PFS was 24.4 months versus 11.6 months in 68 propensity score matched (PSM) historical control group (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.61; p = 0.001). Median OS was 35.4 versus 17.7 months (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.69; p = 0.003). Exploratory post hoc comparison suggests improved survival, but these findings are preliminary and require validation in randomized trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akbari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: