Cross-sectional study explores social networks in urban older Indians, revealing varied types and associations with health and demographics.
This study aims to develop an empirical typology of social networks among urban-living older Indians and assess their association with socio-demographic and health measures. A sample of 378 older persons aged 60 years and above was selected from a cross-sectional primary survey using a semi-structured questionnaire in the Kalyani Municipal Area (KMA) of West Bengal, India. Hierarchical and K-means cluster analysis, using twelve social network variables, revealed five distinct social network types: “Other” (5.82%), “Distant Family” (41.27%), “Friend” (15.08%), “Children,” i.e., living away (28.04%), and “Spouse and Children,” i.e., living together (9.79%). Among these, the distant family network, comprising horizontally extended family members, such as siblings, cousins, relatives, and distant in-laws, emerged as the most common network type, representing nearly half of the respondents. Bivariate analysis revealed that family-based networks were predominant among young-old individuals (60–69 years) who were married, co-residing, economically well-off, and generally in good health. While non-family networks were more common among the oldest-old individuals (≥ 80 years) who were widowed, living alone, financially dependent, and experiencing worse health outcomes. The presented network typology and its association with socio-demographic and health characteristics provide a comprehensive understanding of the structural aspects of social relationships among urban-dwelling older persons and may aid practitioners in designing targeted social interventions to promote healthy ageing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: